SAT考试资源

(十八)SAT官方指南OG 解析(整理版)
内容提要:

<< 返回列表

    SECTION 8

    1

    ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS

    Explanation for Correct Answer C : 

    Choice (C) is correct. "Prey" means victim. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "A swindler’s prey is usually a gullible person who is unable to resist the swindler’s traps." A "swindler" is a con man or crook. People who are cheated by a swindler are victims.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer A : 

    Choice (A) is incorrect. "Peer" means equal. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "A swindler’s peer is usually a gullible person who is unable to resist the swindler’s traps." A "swindler" is a con man or crook, and someone who is a swindler's equal would be another swindler. Such a person would not be described as gullible.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer B : 

    Choice (B) is incorrect. "Ally" means a person who joins with another for a common purpose. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "A swindler’s ally is usually a gullible person who is unable to resist the swindler’s traps." A "swindler" is a con man or crook, and a swindler's "ally" would be one of the swindler's partners. Such a person would understand how the swindler tricks people and would thus be unlikely to be caught in the swindler's traps.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer D : 

    Choice (D) is incorrect. "Nemesis" means successful rival. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "A swindler’s nemesis is usually a gullible person who is unable to resist the swindler’s traps." A "swindler" is a con man or crook, and the successful rival of a swindler would not be described as "usually a gullible person."

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer E : 

    Choice (E) is incorrect. "Superior" means a person in a higher position. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "A swindler’s superior is usually a gullible person who is unable to resist the swindler’s traps." A "swindler" is a con man or crook. A swindler's "superior" would be someone with an advantage in power or intelligence over the swindler, and such a person would be unlikely to become a victim of the swindler.

    2

    ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS

    Explanation for Correct Answer C : 

    Choice (C) is correct. "Expand" means to increase, and "variety" means an assortment of different things. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Improvements in refrigeration and transportation in the nineteenth century expanded the variety of available food for many families in the United States." Improvements naturally involve positive changes, and increasing the types of things that are available to people is obviously a change for the better. This sentence therefore makes sense.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer A : 

    Choice (A) is incorrect. "Slow" means to move at a reduced speed, and "distribution" means handing something out. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Improvements in refrigeration and transportation in the nineteenth century slowed the distribution of available food for many families in the United States." Changes in transportation that resulted in "slowing" the handing out of available food could not be reasonably called improvements.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer B : 

    Choice (B) is incorrect. "Accelerate" means to speed up, and "perishability" means the tendency to spoil. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Improvements in refrigeration and transportation in the nineteenth century accelerated the perishability of available food for many families in the United States." It is illogical to say that improvements in refrigeration would make food spoil faster.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer D : 

    Choice (D) is incorrect. "Lower" means to decrease, and "amount" means number or quantity. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Improvements in refrigeration and transportation in the nineteenth century lowered the amount of available food for many families in the United States." It is illogical to claim that improvements in refrigeration and transportation would decrease the quantity of available food.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer E : 

Choice (E) is incorrect. "Create" means to make, and "dearth" means a severe lack of. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Improvements in refrigeration and transportation in the nineteenth century created the dearth of available food for many families in the United States." One would not expect a severe lack of available food to be a result of improvements in refrigeration and transportation.

    3

    ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS

    Explanation for Correct Answer A : 

    Choice (A) is correct. "Comparison" means to consider the similarities between two things, and "inevitable" means unavoidable. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Although Eudora Welty and William Faulkner wrote in distinctively different styles, comparison between the two is inevitable because they both lived in and wrote about Mississippi." The word "although" signals that the second part of the sentence will contradict the first. Given that Welty and Faulkner are very different, one would not expect them to be studied for their similarities, thus a "comparison" between the two fits the logic of the sentence. Moreover, the information provided at the end of the sentence, that Welty and Faulkner are both from Mississippi, explains why this unlikely "comparison" is in fact unavoidable.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer B : 

    Choice (B) is incorrect. "Cooperation" means working together, and "destructive" means likely to destroy. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Although Eudora Welty and William Faulkner wrote in distinctively different styles, cooperation between the two is destructive because they both lived in and wrote about Mississippi." There is no reason to believe that anything would have been destroyed if Welty and Faulkner had worked together. "Cooperation" between people is typically helpful, not "destructive."

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer C : 

    Choice (C) is incorrect. "Discord" means disagreement, and "legendary" in this context means so well known that people tell stories about it. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Although Eudora Welty and William Faulkner wrote in distinctively different styles, discord between the two is legendary because they both lived in and wrote about Mississippi." The word "although" signals that the second part of the sentence will contradict the first. However, disagreement between writers who write in different styles is not particularly unexpected.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer D : 

    Choice (D) is incorrect. "Similarity" means being alike, and "unlikely" means not probable. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Although Eudora Welty and William Faulkner wrote in distinctively different styles, similarity between the two is unlikely because they both lived in and wrote about Mississippi." It is not sensible to say that "similarity" is "unlikely" between two people who lived in and wrote about the same state. Two writers who lived in and wrote about Mississippi would be relatively alike.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer E : 

    Choice (E) is incorrect. "Rivalry" means a competition, and "redundant" means repeating something unnecessarily. If one were to insert these terms into the text, the sentence would read "Although Eudora Welty and William Faulkner wrote in distinctively different styles, rivalry between the two is redundant because they both lived in and wrote about Mississippi." A competition between two people would not be referred to as "redundant." If a competition between two people is repeated, one would assume that the repetition of the competition is in some way necessary.

    4

    ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS

    Explanation for Correct Answer B : 

    Choice (B) is correct. "Demonstrative" means showing feelings openly. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "Cito Gaston, one of the least demonstrative baseball managers, surprised reporters by weeping openly after his team won the play-offs." This sentence makes sense because a person who is not "demonstrative" would be unlikely to show his feelings. Observers would therefore be surprised to see that person weeping.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer A : 

    Choice (A) is incorrect. "Somber" in this context means gloomy and sad. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "Cito Gaston, one of the least somber baseball managers, surprised reporters by weeping openly after his team won the play-offs." If Cito Gaston were one of the least gloomy baseball managers, the reporters would not be surprised at all to see him openly expressing his joy at winning.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer C : 

    Choice (C) is incorrect. "Insufferable" means intolerable or extremely annoying. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "Cito Gaston, one of the least insufferable baseball managers, surprised reporters by weeping openly after his team won the play-offs." It makes no sense to say that Cito Gaston, one of the least annoying baseball managers, surprised reporters by his display of happiness. This implies that the manager's display annoyed the reporters, which is illogical.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer D : 

    Choice (D) is incorrect. "Bountiful" means generous. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "Cito Gaston, one of the least bountiful baseball managers, surprised reporters by weeping openly after his team won the play-offs." There is no logical connection between thinking of a person as not generous and seeing that person display happiness.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer E : 

    Choice (E) is incorrect. "Wistful" means thoughtful and sad. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "Cito Gaston, one of the least wistful baseball managers, surprised reporters by weeping openly after his team won the play-offs." A person described as "one of the least wistful baseball managers" would have a reputation for being happy, so a display of happiness upon winning would not surprise anyone.

    5

    ANSWERS AND EXPLANATIONS

    Explanation for Correct Answer E : 

    Choice (E) is correct. "Opacity" means being impossible to see through or, in this context, extremely difficult to understand. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "That critic’s writing is so obscure and dense that upon first reading, one finds its opacity hard to penetrate." This sentence makes sense because a piece of writing that is obscure and dense would be very difficult to understand upon first reading it.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer A : 

    Choice (A) is incorrect. "Brevity" means being very short. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "That critic’s writing is so obscure and dense that upon first reading, one finds its brevity hard to penetrate." There is no logical connection between writing that is obscure and dense and writing featuring "brevity," or few words.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer B : 

    Choice (B) is incorrect. "Rigidity" means being stiff. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "That critic’s writing is so obscure and dense that upon first reading, one finds its rigidity hard to penetrate." Though obscurity, density, and stiffness are all negative qualities of writing, they are not connected in the way the sentence portrays. Writing that is obscure and dense would not necessarily be stiff.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer C : 

    Choice (C) is incorrect. "Floridity" means being flowery. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "That critic’s writing is so obscure and dense that upon first reading, one finds its floridity hard to penetrate." Flowery writing may have many unnecessary words or an inappropriate tone, but it is not necessarily dense or obscure.

    Explanation for Incorrect Answer D : 

    Choice (D) is incorrect. "Harmony" means being orderly and pleasing. If one were to insert this term into the text, the sentence would read "That critic’s writing is so obscure and dense that upon first reading, one finds its harmony hard to penetrate." When a piece of writing is described as obscure or dense, it is because the reader considers it to be poorly ordered and definitely not pleasing.

客户反馈

  • 编辑确实给了我很多帮助,申请文书得到了非常宝贵的建议及细致的修改,甚至准确到对字数的要求。 我真正感觉到文章从“好”到“优秀”的转变,让我能更充分地展示自己的优点。


    - 本科留学,该同学已被加州大学洛杉矶分校录取

  • 知羿对我的文章进行的修改可谓点睛之作,学校电话面试时提到了文书写得很好,非常感谢您们的 帮助。


    - 本科留学,该同学已被乔治亚大学录取

  • 我相信申请文书的写作会起很大的作用,知羿在这方面帮我争取到了足够的分数,让我区别于其他 申请者有了较大的优势。


    - 本科留学,该同学已被斯坦福大学录取

  • 我女儿的文书经过编辑后,非常漂亮,可以很有信心地投送出去了。我非常敬佩编辑的态度,他以大 学招生录取者的角度全面剖析了文书的优缺点并得以改善。作为一名家长,非常幸运可以替孩子找到 知羿这 样的编辑公司。


    - 本科留学,该家长的女儿已被佛罗里达州立大学录取

  • 作为一名非英语为母语的学生,我非常担心自己的语言表达是否得当,而且我了解到我所申请的专业 对语言的要求非常高。为此,我感到没有足够的信心。经一朋友介绍,我选择了知羿帮我进行文书的编 辑。 非常高兴的是,我拿到了学校的录取通知书。


    - 本科留学,该同学已被俄亥俄州立大学录取

  • 我的第一意向学校是斯坦福,但我觉得自己的GRE成绩太差,录取的可能性很小。最后,我不但被几所 名校录取(包括斯坦福),而且也获得了奖学金。我相信申请文书在这其中起到了关键性的作用,因此一 些朋 友和我相关的处境却被拒了。


    - 研究生留学申请,该同学已被斯坦福大学录取

  • 我非常需要有人以客观的眼光来对我的申请文书进行修改并给出建设性的意见。关于这一点,知羿 的编辑确实做到了,这将成为我申请材料中的亮点。


    - 研究生留学申请,该同学的申请院校为达特茅斯学院

  • 我觉得这项文书的写作服务让我在申请材料中增加了一项优势,便我非常顺利地得到了来自目标学校 的录取通知。希望知羿越来越优秀。


    - 研究生留学申请,该同学已被匹兹堡大学录取

  • 非常有价值的服务!你们的编辑使我的申请材料中的语言写作有了很大的改进,让我更加自信地递交 了申请并最终取得了成功。我已经向正在申请的朋友及准备申请的学弟学妹们推荐了你们的服务。真的是 非常 好的服务!


    - 研究生留学申请,该同学已被莱斯大学录取

  • 真的没想到自己可以进入常青藤联盟的学校攻读我的PhD学位,我原先预计的是进入一所州立大学。当 我收到宾夕法尼亚大学的录取通知时,我的第一反应是:这次的申请文书材料帮了我很大的忙。


    - 研究生留学申请,该同学已被宾夕法尼亚大学录取

  • 我非常高兴自己的申请文书可以得到专业的修改和建议。 编辑看完的当初写的文书后,觉得非常糟 糕,甚至对它进行了重写。现在回想起来,这个决定是非常正确的。


    - 商学院留学申请,该同学已被乔治敦大学录取

  • 知羿从我的文书中挑选出几项非常有特色的部分进行重点描述,而且编辑告诉我删除掉的部分为什 么对成功申请毫无作用。从这个过程中,我学习到了很多。


    - 商学院留学申请,该同学已被卡内基梅隆大学录取

  • 知羿帮助我怎样运用恰当的表达技巧完成个人陈述。特别要提出的是,这节省了我大量的时间,从 而可以去准备别的材料及手续。


    - 商学院留学申请,该同学已被南加州大学录取

  • 我花了很长时间来准备自己的个人陈述及推荐信等材料,但始终觉得不足令人满意。知羿的编辑告 诉了我怎样突出自己并简洁明了。因此,我觉得选择知羿的决定是非常正确的,受益匪浅。


    - 法学院留学申请,该同学已被纽约大学录取